Review of THE CASE STUDY by Nicole Lundrigan (New Release)

 4 Stars

A couple of years ago I read A Man Downstairs, a psychological thriller by this Canadian author, and I really enjoyed it. When I noticed she had a new book scheduled for release, I was anxious to read it. It too proved to be an enjoyable read.

Mia, many years ago, read a magazine article about a murderous teenage girl suffering with Cotard’s Syndrome, a rare neuropsychiatric condition in which the affected person holds the delusional belief that s/he is deceased or does not exist. Fascinated, Mia sought out Ian Morrison, the psychiatrist who treated her, and ended up marrying him. Twenty years later, when Ian announces that his famous case study will be republished and he will be reconnecting with his former patient, Mia gains access to the therapy sessions and obsessively pores over them.

Lainey is that patient. When Ian reaches out, she decides to tell him the truth of what happened in her past which resulted in her diagnosis and her being confined for years to a psychiatric facility. She becomes fixated on Ian’s personal life. She takes an especial interest in learning what she can about his wife Mia and daughter Elise and tries to insert herself into their lives.

The book is a fast-paced read. The perspectives of the two women are provided, Mia’s in third person and Lainey’s in first-person. I suspected early on that neither is totally reliable because both have hidden agendas and are capable of deception. In fact, none of the main characters is totally trustworthy: besides Mia and Lainey, Mia’s husband, mother and daughter keep secrets.

For me, Ian is the most dislikeable character. He is not really trying to help Lainey; he wants her case to revitalize his career. He has a sense of superiority and he manipulates Mia. What is learned about his relationship with Faye, his mother-in-law, I found difficult to believe, though it certainly adds to my negative impression of him.

Like A Man Downstairs, this novel examines parent-child relationships. We learn about Lainey’s relationships with her mother and the uncle who adopted her and that of Mia’s with Faye. Then there’s Mia’s relationship with Elise.

There are several twists and turns which surprised me, but looking back, I found they explained actions which had bothered me. For instance, why is Mia so obsessed with Lainey’s case? Why does Lainey react as she does when she first sees Elise? What is not clear is clarified by those twists and turns.

I will recommend this as a perfect summer read. It grabs attention from the beginning and keeps the reader entertained throughout.

Note: I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of COUNTY ROAD SIX by Kevin Hardcastle (New Release)

 2.5 Stars

This book was not for me. I found it a tedious read and I kept checking to see how many more pages there were left until the end.

After the death of Arthur O’Hare by suicide, his three daughters (Beth, Mara, and Emma) reunite at the family farm. The three women soon learn that they have not just inherited the farm but a long-buried secret that has them fighting to retain ownership of the farmhouse and land. They face terror and violence and must take extreme measures to protect themselves.

Though set in Simcoe County, Ontario, near the shores of Georgian Bay, in many ways the book reminded me of a Cormac McCarthy novel. There are scenes of intense violence described in graphic detail. This is not the type of book I enjoy so I guess I’m not the intended audience.

Pacing is a real problem. The novel opens very slowly; almost nothing happens for pages and pages. There is often little dialogue and actions are described in tedious detail. For instance, “Mara put a hand to her mouth and muttered into it and then she flicked the switch again and the room went dark. She drew the door shut and pulled until it reluctantly latched. Mara fetched her bottle from the kitchen and went into the living room and sat the end of the couch near to her father’s old armchair. Long haul from the bottle before she set it by. The woman lifted her phone and looked to the messages pending but she did not open them.” There are irrelevant details: do we really need to know the history of the local Legion Hall? What’s the fixation with cardinal directions? West is mentioned a dozen times and north is mentioned twice that! Then, in the latter part of the book, there are chapters that have action, but again individual movements are described in such detail that tension is lost. With its detailing of all movements, the book sometimes reads almost like a screenplay. The book is totally lacking taut prose.

Then there’s the strange phrasing of some sentences: “They were stood some twenty yards away from the target” and “Mara was stood there long after” and “Emma was stood in the lamplight” and “a broom that was stood against the side of the house.” Perhaps this odd passive voice construction is an example of local colour, but it’s not used in speech so it is just awkward.

In contrast to the heavy physical descriptions, there is a lot of vagueness in terms of plot. What exactly did Arthur do to earn his fearful reputation in the community? And about his past, the reader can only guess at his activities. What exactly was the cause of the rift between Arthur and his first wife’s family? Arthur Cass is Arthur O’Hare? Why did Arthur abandon Tynan? The reader eventually learns that Beth and Mara’s mother was First Nations, so the girls were discriminated against when they were young. But the discrimination faced by them and their mother’s cousin Marie is only alluded to, not really shown.

The book is marketed as a “propulsive, powerful, and thrilling novel” but I did not find this to be the case. It is overly long and written in a style that lessens tension and increases tedium.

Note:  I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of THE SPINNING HEART by Donal Ryan (Re-Release)

 4 Stars

I’ve read three of Donal Ryan’s novels and have loved them all. The Spinning Heart is his debut novel from 2012 which is being re-released. It won numerous awards and I can understand why.

The book is set in a rural Irish town in the aftermath of the country’s financial crisis in 2008. Through the inner monologues of 21 of the community’s residents, we see the impact of the sudden closure of a construction firm. Jobs vanish, livelihoods crumble, and tensions escalate; the ripple effects of the property bubble burst are wide-ranging.

Though a plot of sorts emerges, the focus is definitely on people. With the number of characters, I feared getting confused, but that was not the case. I enjoyed learning about the blood ties. We encounter Bridie and later her brother Jim. Lily speaks longingly about her granddaughter Millicent who later also has a voice in the book. First we meet Josie who mentions he has a daughter that he doesn’t discuss anymore; later his daughter Mags speaks and we learn the reason for the fracture in their relationship. There are also plot connections: Trevor and Lloyd’s choices affect Réaltín and Seanie most directly but also Kate and her husband Denis; the latter acts in a way that changes the lives of Frank, Bobby, and Triona.

The character with the first monologue is Bobby Mahon. He is very much the heart of the novel. Almost all of the other 20 characters mention Bobby and almost all admit, though some grudgingly, that he’s a good man. He’s a decent, hard-working, humble, and loving man who tries to help others; his wife Triona best describes him as someone who takes on the troubles of others.

Each character is carefully crafted. What is commendable is that each emerges as a complex character with both positive and negative traits. Even characters who seem to be evil are shown to have understandable motivations, if not redeeming qualities. Frank Mahon, Bobby’s father, is a prime example. Frank drank until he had wasted his entire inheritance, made the lives of his wife and son an absolute misery, and continues to verbally abuse Bobby. Virtually no one has a kind word to say about Frank, but in the end, we learn the reasons for his behaviour, and his daughter-in-law says, “I started for the first time to think that there was more inside in Frank than just spite.”

What is emphasized is that there is often a contrast between how people present themselves to the world and the inner truths they conceal from the world. Sometimes how people are perceived by others is not accurate. One character worries whether he might have inherited his father’s schizophrenia. Someone viewed by everyone as a womanizer suffers with depression and has contemplated suicide. Two young men decide to leave Ireland to find employment elsewhere, but worry about hurting their parents. One young man is viewed as lacking intelligence but he provides the key to solving a crime. People in small towns often believe they know everything about everyone else, but that is not usually the case.

The novel depicts life in a small town. People gossip: there are tales about Bobby that tarnish his reputation. Triona scoffs at how “The Teapot Taliban fattened on their stories.” People are judgmental: people ostracize Lily. There are instances where neighbours help neighbours, but Triona comments that this may be the case only in good times: “if we were all in the black we’d all be in the pink. The air is thick with platitudes around here. We’ll all pull together. We’re a tight-knit community. We’ll all support each other. Oh really?”

Much of the subject matter is serious. There are examples of domestic violence, alcoholism, dysfunctional families, and generational trauma. We read about strong emotions: fear, hopelessness, anger, and grief. There is suspense: When Kate hires Trevor, we know the risk. And will Dylan be found? Did Bobby do what he admits wanting to do? There are also, however, moments of tenderness; parents love and worry about their children. The love between Bobby and Triona certainly stands out, and the novel’s last sentence is significant.

The novel is written using Irish vernacular so I did occasionally find myself at a loss: came a cropper, ollagoan, skittin, crathur, tacher, tapping a flaker, culchie, subbie, and cigire are examples of slang that left me confused. Nonetheless, this language adds local colour and authenticity.

I highly recommend this book. It is masterfully written. A follow-up, Heart, Be at Peace, was released recently; it returns to the village a decade later. It’s just been added to my to-read stack.

Here are links to my reviews of more Donal Ryan’s books:

Strange Flowers: https://schatjesshelves.blogspot.com/2021/10/review-of-strange-flowers-by-donal-ryan.html

From a Low and Quiet Sea: https://schatjesshelves.blogspot.com/2019/01/review-of-from-low-and-quiet-sea-by.html

The Queen of Dirt Island: https://schatjesshelves.blogspot.com/2023/02/review-of-queen-of-dirt-island-by-donal.html

Note: I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of JUNE BABY by Shannon Garvey (New Release)

 2.5 Stars

This novel was not for me; its pace is so slow and its main character could be a case study for psychological/emotional arrested development.

Twenty-seven-year-old Ruth returns to Block Island, off the coast of Rhode Island, where she has spent the last ten summers. After her mother Maggie died when Ruth was seventeen, her father sent her to live on the island with Diana, a renowned photographer who had been friends with Maggie. It is there that Ruth fell in love with Charlie, Diana’s nephew who visited his aunt every summer.

Things are different this year because Diana died at the beginning of the summer. Ruth yearns to re-connect with Charlie, but he has surprising news. And there are more surprises from Diana as well. All this leaves Ruth wondering how well she knew the two women who raised her. Overwhelmed by the loss that she believes has shaped her life, Ruth is unable to move on.

Ruth is not a likeable character. Though approaching thirty, she is immature and self-centred. She behaves like a teenager, making one bad choice after another. When someone makes constructive suggestions to help her, she treats them as negative criticisms. Instead of taking responsibility for her decisions, she blames her losses for her lack of motivation. I disliked how she treats others; in essence, she uses them for what they can do for her. She’s so insufferable, I don’t understand why anyone would want to spend time with her. Stuck in the past, she is aimless, choosing to live from pay cheque to pay cheque though she bemoans her lack of financial security, and sneers at others who have chosen a path for their lives and are taking steps to reach their goals. The name of the island is a perfect metaphor for her blocked emotional life.

What is especially frustrating about Ruth is that she is given opportunities but she refuses to take them. Diana, for ten years, has tried to help Ruth, introducing her to people and making her aware of possibilities. Ironically, she envies the advantages of other people but cannot see those that she has rejected.

I understand that everyone experiences grief differently, but Ruth just wallows in it. Her mother died so certainly a reader will have sympathy for her. She does, however, end up with Diana who becomes like a surrogate mother who does so much to support Ruth for ten years. When Diana dies, Ruth doesn’t really honour Diana; instead, she focuses on what she herself has lost and doesn’t even consider that others too might be grieving. After a while, any sympathy I had for Ruth was replaced with irritation and anger.

Reading this book was not an enjoyable experience. The slow pace means the book drags. The fact that the writing style relies on exposition and has little dialogue makes it monotonous to read. Whatever happened to showing rather than telling? I do not need books to be action-paced, preferring character-driven ones, but Ruth is overly introspective which results in over-thinking and stagnation. The more time I spent in her head, the less I liked her, and the more I wanted to get out. At the end I just felt exhausted. It’s not as if she gains much insight in her constant self-examinations; she accuses her father of ignoring her or running from her, and being too sensitive and remote, yet doesn’t recognize she behaves in the same ways. Isn’t this called projection? In addition, there is considerable description of setting, but much of it is over-description and repetitive.

Though this novel is being marketed as a coming-of-age story, I’m not convinced that Ruth will change. June is seen by many as a month of personal empowerment and renewal but Ruth shows little potential in that regard so, for me, the second word in the title is what stands out when I think of her. Her exploitative behaviour and lack of empathy mean I have little empathy for her so I didn’t enjoy my time in her company.

Note: I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of THE CALAMITY CLUB by Kathryn Stockett (New Release)

 3.5 Stars

This is the second book by the author known for her 2008 novel, The Help. The Calamity Club is a dual perspective novel set in Oxford, Mississippi, in 1933.

Meg Lefleur, ll years old, has lived in an orphanage for two years but refuses to believe her mother deliberately abandoned her. Garnett Pittman, the orphanage director, hates the smart and sassy Meg and makes her life truly miserable: denying her an education and abusing her both physically and psychologically.

Birdie Calhoun, 24, comes to Oxford to visit her sister Frances who has married a banker. Birdie’s mother and grandmother fear losing their house because they haven’t been able to pay their taxes, so Birdie is sent to ask for money from Frances. While Birdie waits for Frances to ask for the money from her husband Rory, Birdie volunteers at the orphanage. There she meets and befriends Meg. Then, just as Meg is adopted, her mother Charlie arrives looking for her daughter and she begs Birdie to help her find Meg.

At 650+ pages, this is a big book with a long and windy plot. In some ways, it almost feels like two books; Charlie’s arrival takes events into an entirely different direction than expected. Her audacious and dangerous scheme to reclaim her life and her daughter is unlikely and unconvincing. That Charlie, Birdie and the others involved are able to avoid reprisals for so long stretches credulity. And though there are quite a few dramatic developments, the pace slackens at times. Is the on again – off again romantic subplot really necessary? Then the ending feels rushed. Everything is tied together but in a loose fashion. Given the earlier attention to details, the ending is quite a contrast. I would have preferred a more focused narrative.

There is certainly a cast of colourful characters, especially after Charlie arrives on the scene. I liked Birdie who is a kind and compassionate young woman. I did find her rather naive, though the time period and her rather sheltered life do perhaps explain her innocence. Meg steals the show for me. Intelligent and inquisitive, she is precocious. Her resilience in the face of her mistreatment from Garnett and others is admirable. Though young, she is less innocent than Birdie because her life experiences have opened her eyes to people’s cruelties and hypocrisies.

Garnett is a totally despicable character with no redeeming qualities. Her absolute villainy makes her unrealistic. Early in the novel, the connection between Garnett and Meg is signposted when she describes being rescued by Welty. When Birdie becomes aware of the connection, a possible solution to finding Meg and stopping Garnett’s interference in the girl’s life is obvious. No one has the courage to confront Welty or Garnett? Instead there’s a convoluted and wild plan that is just too far-fetched.

The book touches on a number of topics: homosexuality, prostitution, forced sterilization of women, adultery, prohibition, poverty, alcoholism, sexism and racism. Because the novel is set during the Great Depression, there is emphasis on the difficult choices faced by people.

The book is entertaining. Some scenes are hilarious, almost slapstick, especially in how Charlie and Birdie try to hide the nature of their enterprise. Meg’s comments can also be funny. There are heartbreaking scenes, particularly when Meg’s mistreatment is described. There is tension, mostly regarding Meg’s fate. I kept wondering exactly what would be best for Meg. Other scenes are heartwarming; the power of female friendship is definitely emphasized. My one wish is that the book were shortened with some judicious revision and editing.

Note: I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of JOHN OF JOHN by Douglas Stuart (New Release)

 4.5 Stars

I was amazed by Douglas Stuart’s previous novels, Shuggie Bain and Young Mungo, which I found emotionally intense. This, his latest, is another masterpiece.

In the waning years of the twentieth century, twenty-two-year-old John-Calum (Cal) Macleod returns to the Isle of Harris in the Outer Hebrides after completing his studies at a textile design school. He returns home with naught but his education and a lot of debt. He moves back into the croft in which he had grown up; living there are his father John and his maternal grandmother Ella. As a closeted gay man living in a small and ultra-conservative religious community, Cal is not happy, but he feels a sense of duty towards his family. Because he has few options, he tries to shape a life, but he is restless and there are constant conflicts with his father.

The three people living in the croft are all outsiders in some way. Cal, with his long hair and city clothes and his unwillingness to marry a local girl and continue the family legacy, is viewed with disapproval, and he knows he would never be accepted if his sexual orientation were known. John is a pillar of the church and community but he has a deep secret which, if uncovered, he knows would turn everyone against him. Ella is a permanent outsider; brought from Glasgow by her husband many years ago, she has never been fully accepted. Her foul mouth and her inability to speak Gaelic mean she is isolated.

Unfortunately, Cal and John don’t try to understand each other. Ella describes them fittingly: “’Islands within islands . . . within islands, within islands.’” There are so many secrets and so much is left unspoken that they are really like their neighbours, Innes and Sorley MacInnes, brothers who live in the same house but haven’t spoken to each other directly for sixteen years. In fact, both father and son are very similar. Both are full of anger, shame, and fear, and are lonely, with a longing to love and be loved. Both carry a burden of secrets; the publisher describes the novel as being “about the face we put out to the world, which may not be the person we truly are.” Both John and Cal are pressured by the remoteness of their home, their sense of duty to family, the expectations of a community tied to tradition, and their rigid Calvinist faith. The only difference is that John has experienced these pressures for twice as many years as Cal.

The characters are complex and deeply flawed but they are definitely believable. Sometimes they are selfish and sometimes generous. Cal tends to be self-centred but his gift to Isla, for instance, is so unselfish given what he could have done with it. John and Cal love each other, but John can be violent and Cal is not beyond behaving cruelly and hatefully. I did not always like the two and I found myself feeling frustrated with them, two men with, in Ella’s words, “’A shockin’ lack of self-expression.’” But it is impossible to forget that both are tortured, broken men. My heart breaks for both.

I found it interesting that women also have secrets, but they tend to keep them to protect others. Ella considers telling her grandson about the secret in her past, but she worries about the effect on Cal. Grace, Cal’s mother, left John years earlier and Cal feels she abandoned him as well. The truth is that Grace left for another reason which she never discusses; that secret might now redeem her in her son’s eyes but would have hurt Cal as a young boy.

Ella is actually my favourite character. She’s strong and fiercely independent. She can be manipulative, but in the end her machinations are intended to help people, though they may not see it that way. Even her son-in-law, with whom she has a difficult relationship, she wants to be happy. She tells Cal, “’Make yourself happy, son. Christ above, let one of us be happy.’”

This is a character-driven, not a plot-driven, novel. Slow-moving and reflective, it focuses on Cal’s perspective, but also presents the viewpoints of John, Ella, and Innes so we see their inner conflicts in depth. Nonetheless, there is suspense: secrets are gradually revealed and the reader can only wonder what will be uncovered next and what will be the ramifications. The descriptions of the environment create a strong sense of place. With its emotional intensity this book shares similarities with Stuart’s previous novels, but this one has less brutality and even touches of humour.

The novel ends on a note of hope, though much is left unknown. Insightful and well-written, Douglas Stuart’s books always provide an immersive experience which leaves the reader changed.

See my reviews of Stuart’s other books:

Shuggie Bain - https://schatjesshelves.blogspot.com/2020/10/review-of-shuggie-bain-by-douglas-stuart.html

Young Mungo - https://schatjesshelves.blogspot.com/2022/04/review-of-young-mungo-by-douglas-stuart.html

Note: I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of THE WOMEN by Kristin Hannah

 2.5 Stars

This is a book with great intentions: shining a spotlight on the experiences of a woman in the Vietnam War and how they impact her life thereafter. The execution, however, is poor.

Frances (Frankie) McGrath is twenty-one when she enlists as an army nurse in 1966. The first part of the novel details her time in Vietnam: working grueling hours looking after the wounded, some with horrific injuries, sometimes while being attacked. Living conditions are unsanitary and the only reprieve seems to be drinking in the officers’ clubs. Frankie is naive, idealistic and inexperienced but quickly has her eyes opened to the realities of war and she becomes a skilled surgical nurse.

In the second part of the novel, Frankie returns home after two years. She does not receive the welcome she expects. Her nursing career stalls and romantic relationships don’t evolve as hoped. Other than her two friends Ethel and Barb, fellow nurses she met in Vietnam, she has little support. Almost inevitably, her life spirals out of control.

I had a number of issues with the book. One was a lack of credibility. Frankie is a trained nurse but only in Basic Training does she learn how to apply a splint, debride a wound, and start an IV? She is no longer a teenager when the book opens but her bedroom is that of a child complete with pogo stick and hula hoop? Her mother’s letters focus on protests against the war and her disgust for the bouncing breasts of hippies? The idea that Vietnam veterans were widely spat on upon their return is largely considered a historical myth, with no documented, verified incidents from the era. More than once she is turned away by a veterans’ organization after being told that no women served in Vietnam? The use of a soap opera trope, resurrections, not once but twice, left me rolling my eyes! The meeting at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial at the end is just too convenient and unbelievable.

The book can best be described as overwritten. There are constant references to women’s bouffant hair and men’s mustaches and sideburns. Clothing is described in great detail; head-to-toe descriptions of what a character is wearing are not necessary. Frankie’s mother visits her daughter after what can only be called as a very tragic event and the author feels it is necessary to describe her being “dressed in a rust-colored skirt with a print vest over a blouse buttoned up to her throat, and knee-high boots”? Then there’s the constant mention of titles of songs. I understand the need to add local colour but there’s such a thing as too much.

There is also too much focus on romance. Why is it that every guy falls in love with Frankie? Certainly men greatly outnumbered women in the war, but why then do Ethel and Barb not have romantic relationships as frequently? Frankie even has married men willing to leave their wives for her. One man signs up for a second tour in Vietnam because of her. Once she returns stateside, her relationships with men seem more triggers of her PTSD than the war itself. One relationship seems to almost cure her PTSD but the symptoms reemerge when she learns a man has deceived her. She seems more lovesick and heartbroken than a person struggling with PTSD.

Even the title is misleading. Only one woman’s experiences and perspective are given. I would have like to read about those of other women, not just that of a privileged white woman. Since blacks were disproportionately represented in Vietnam, the perspective of Barb, a black woman, would have provided more depth and insight. At times, I felt the title should have included a reference to men because so many of Frankie’s decisions revolve around men. She goes to war because a man tells her women can be heroes and because she wants to impress her father; she re-ups because the boys need her; and her PTSD symptoms are controlled or recur depending on the state of her romantic relationships with men.

I did not find Frankie particularly admirable. Yes, she worked hard in deplorable conditions to help others and certainly deserved recognition for that work. She is fortunate to have Ethel and Barb to support her, though the two women often feel more like props than real people. Yet I found that Frankie doesn’t offer the same kind of support to new nurses arriving in Vietnam. Once back in the U.S. she relies on Barb and Ethel who, more than once, fly out to help and support her. But then when Barb’s brother dies, Frankie sends only a letter?! She just seems selfish and self-centred.

I did appreciate that the author treated the complexities of the Vietnam War in a fair manner. She does mention the American atrocities and the lies of the politicians. She does mention the suffering of Vietnamese civilians. She shows that Vietnam veterans often received a cold, indifferent, or hostile homecoming, markedly different from the heroes' welcome given to previous generations. Clearly her message is that it should be possible to support the warriors while still hating the war.

I was disappointed because instead of historical fiction, the book often reads more like a romance. Women’s roles in the Vietnam War and their struggles once home deserve to be highlighted, but this novel does not do these topics justice, instead opting for cheesy romances and an unrealistic but happy resolution.