Review of A BIRD IN WINTER by Louise Doughty

 2.5 Stars

I’ve enjoyed other of Doughty’s books so thought I’d listen to this one on my morning walks. Unfortunately, it was a disappointment.

Heather, nicknamed Bird, is a middle-aged woman who works for the British secret service. She suddenly goes on the run but the reason why and whom she is fleeing is unknown. Only slowly, through flashbacks, are details filled in.

This book is marketed as a thriller but it’s the slowest thriller I’ve ever read. Heather is on the run but because she withholds information and reveals it only in dribs and drabs, I wondered whether she is really in danger. Maybe she’s an unreliable narrator. She spends a lot of time reflecting on her past and how stunted her life has been because of her chosen career. As she moves from place to place, there are detailed descriptions of the towns and landscapes she encounters. At times I felt I was reading a travelogue. Neither introspection nor setting descriptions are hallmarks of thrillers.

There is not a great deal of suspense. Except for one incident, threats are vague and there are extended periods when she lives like a tourist. This is my polite way of saying that I was bored a great deal of the time. There is so much information about a past friendship and so much description of the scenery, especially in her last location, that it’s difficult to determine what is relevant.

Some events are just implausible. Heather gets into debt because of a real estate deal but then has unlimited funds for extended travel; not once does she express any concern about running out of money. Even in the remotest or smallest places, she easily finds accommodation? And then there’s the ending with so many unanswered questions, though the identity of the person manipulating everything is no surprise since it’s been hinted at from the beginning.

When I reached the end, I wondered whether I’d missed something because I’d listened to an audiobook rather than read a physical text. The misleading marketing is definitely a problem; the novel is not a thriller in the traditional sense. Instead, the book explores the impact of a woman’s past choices and the emotional toll of being forced to flee and leave everything behind.

Review of THE BOY FROM THE SEA by Garrett Carr (New Release)

 4 Stars

The novel is set in Killybegs, Ireland’s largest fishing port, in County Donegal. In 1973, an infant is found on the beach and is eventually adopted by Ambrose and Christine Bonnar who already have a two-year-old son named Declan. They name the boy Brendan. The novel covers approximately 18 years, telling the story of the Bonnar family: Ambrose’s struggles to provide for his family as a fisherman, Christine’s contentious relationship with her sister Phyllis, Declan’s bitter jealousy of Brendan, and Brendan’s always feeling like an outsider. We also learn about life in the community.

Point of view is especially interesting. The omniscient narrator, using the first person plural, is the townspeople. The effect is that of a Greek chorus. The reactions of the townspeople to events are documented. As seasons pass, a summary of the fates of others outside the Bonnar family is included: “The season turned. The vocational school had its first public exams and the students did well. The Ros Finn went up on rocks and two of the crew were treated for hypothermia. Johnny the Matchbox won good money on the sweepstakes and we all despaired as he was sure to waste it.”

This narrative approach suggests a story told over a Guinness in an Irish pub. The reader is addressed as someone familiar with the townspeople: “[Pat Ward] wasn’t belonging to the coal dealer Wards, but the Straoughter Wards, the ones with the freckly faces.” What emerges is a real sense of a real place.

Certainly the portrayal of life in a small town is conveyed accurately. Everyone knows everyone’s business and gossip spreads quickly. But there is also support for each other; when tragedy strikes, the entire community shows up to help. What is also shown is the challenges faced by a tight-knit community in a changing world: people leaving the town to find work elsewhere.

Changes in the fishing industry are described. Ambrose is a skilled fisherman with a deep connection to the sea. At first he does well but then he faces competition from larger and larger trawlers. Fishing becomes an increasingly commercialized industry and the ocean is viewed “like it was a factory floor”; near the end of the book, there is reference to dwindling stocks.

The novel also examines other subjects. Sibling relationships are explored: there’s Declan’s unwillingness to accept Brendan as his brother and their intense competition for their father’s love and attention. Both boys make decisions based on rivalry. Christine and Phyllis are close and need each other but disagreements arise: Phyllis feels trapped because she has to care for her father and she objects to Brendan’s adoption so there are clashes and times when the sisters don’t speak to each other.

Another topic that stands out for me is men’s lack of self-reflection and their inability to articulate their feelings: Ambrose belongs to “a lineage of quiet men, each contained to the point of self-repression, generation after generation of horizonwatchers, preferring to look out at a wordless intensity than have even a second of introspection.” The reader is told that “Ambrose had all the language required to define precisely the meaning of a cloud, the character of a sea, an attitude of rain, but to describe his own emotional weather he was limited to ‘Been better,’ ‘Been worse’ and ‘You know yourself.’” Love is seldom expressed; when Declan states he’d love to try a certain fishing ground, Ambrose thinks, “Love was a strong word, everyone listened with interest.” Ambrose leaves for a fishing trip by kissing Christine on the cheek and saying “’Mind yourself.’” One particular description is so fitting: “Donegal men had strikingly big key fobs, we tended to have many padlocks in our lives.”

Despite the novel’s seriousness, there are sprinkles of gentle humour: “If there was a trophy for not mentioning things Tommy would’ve won it, then kept it at the back of his wardrobe and never mentioned it.” A member of Ambrose’s crew complains about his wife wanting an extension built on their home: “’And I don’t even want another room, I’m happy enough to go sit in the car when we’ve a row.’” Phyllis and Christine discuss how it would be better to die than to survive a nuclear bomb: “’but they’ll have no reason to drop a bomb here. Donegal will be ignored again.’”

Some readers might object to the sometimes meandering plot, but I loved the book. Its portrayal of life in a small community is so authentic; I definitely saw my family and childhood reflected in the book and I think many readers will as well.

Note: I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of THE CURE by Eve Smith (New Release)

 4 Stars

This dystopian thriller is narrated from the perspectives of two women: Ruth and Mara.

Ruth, years earlier, while searching for a cure for the disease that led to her daughter’s premature death, accidentally discovered a vaccine against age-related diseases. Erik Grundleger, a colleague, hijacked this vaccine known as ReJuve and, with the help of a billionaire obsessed with immortality, created an upgrade, SuperJuve, which extends human life span. There were disastrous consequences so laws were passed to limit life to 120 years. Supers who took SuperJuve are tracked down by Omnicide investigators and executed. One of these investigators is Mara who hesitantly teams up with Ruth to find Grundleger.

The reader comes to understand the two women and what drives them. Ruth is easy to like from the beginning. Her intention was always to help people like her daughter, and she even tried to insure that her discovery would not be misused. Mara, known as The Blade, is more difficult to like. She’s a relentless, merciless hunter of Supers but the reason for her obsession becomes clear; like Ruth, she experienced a trauma that profoundly affected her.

The novel is very thought-provoking. It forces us to consider what might happen if people lived longer. The novel suggests that if the population of the planet increased, there could be housing and food shortages. Natural environments are devastated leading to extinction of animals as land is needed to build homes: “open grasslands no longer exist. They were razed for food production and housing.” The old outnumber the young who become resentful: “crime is rising amongst the younger generations who are out of work, out of an inheritance, and out of patience.” Amongst the many centenarians, there’s an emotional toll of living longer. Loneliness and depression are major concerns: “there’s an increasingly anxious and disconnected generation of elders who lack purpose and fulfilment.”

What the novel also emphasizes is the extreme disparity between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of the world. To receive ReJuve, citizens must meet criteria, one of which stipulates that they must pay into an accredited pension scheme for a minimum of sixty years. Not everyone qualifies for ReJuve so the lives of the disadvantaged have not improved. As for SuperJuve, it can only be afforded by the ultra-rich who obviously will do whatever is necessary to access it. And what if SuperJuve had side-effects which were dangerous for everyone?

The name of the SuperJuve investor is Jeff Busk who has a “net worth of over three hundred billion dollars.” Is the name an amalgam of Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, two people with unlimited wealth and power? I can imagine these two men would concur with the choices made by Grundleger and Supers. Channeling the names of two of the richest men in the world just adds to the realism of the novel. We are already seeing extreme financial inequality in the world and the devastation of ecosystems so what the author is suggesting is certainly not far-fetched.

In the latter part of the novel, the thriller elements come to the fore. Ruth and Mara find themselves in increasing danger so tension also increases. And, as expected in thrillers, there are some plot twists. There are a couple of instances where there was reliance on coincidence but it was not enough to affect my enjoyment of the novel.

Because what is described is plausible, this is a terrifying cautionary tale. The book entertains and informs – a perfect combination for me.

Review of THE GRANDDAUGHTER by Bernhard Schlink

 4 Stars

Bernhard Schlink is best known for his 1997 novel The Reader, but I’ve enjoyed other of his books and so picked up The Granddaughter, his most recent offering.

Seventy-one-year-old Kaspar Wettner is a bookseller in Berlin grieving the death of his wife Birgit. When going through her papers, he discovers she had left behind a baby in East Berlin when she fled to West Germany. He decides to search for his stepdaughter Svenja and eventually finds her living in a rural community of Völkisch people – far-right, white supremacist nationalists. Svenja and her husband Björn have a daughter, 14-year-old Sigrun, who is an enthusiastic believer in far-right ideology. Kaspar manipulates her parents into allowing Sigrun to spend time with him, time he hopes he can use to broaden Sigrun’s worldview.

Kaspar is the grandfather most people would like to have. He is patient and tolerant. When he learns about Brigit’s daughter, he is determined to find her, and when he meets Sigrun, he is determined to establish a relationship with her. Liberal and progressive in his views, he finds Sigrun’s anti-Semitic, xenophobic, Holocaust denying comments offensive, but he admires her curiosity, strength, and loyalty. A cultured man, he takes her to concerts and introduces her to books she would not encounter in her insular world. When he discovers she has a talent for the piano, he pays for lessons. He takes her on a trip to broaden her horizons.

Of course, Kaspar has to tread carefully as he tries to correct Sigrun’s understanding of German history. Her parents certainly fear Kaspar’s influence because they insist on strict rules while she visits Kaspar: for example, she cannot wear jeans, use the internet, or go to the cinema. He doesn’t want to alienate them because they might deny him visitations. He is also afraid to contradict Sigrun too forcefully for fear that she herself might choose to end their relationship. This leaves him wondering if/how he can challenge her radical opinions.

It is not just Sigrun’s views which are challenged. Kaspar is forced to confront his prejudices. For instance, Sigrun draws attention to his attitude of superiority. He does not agree with how Sigrun has been parented, but he comes to understand the reasons for Svenja and Björn’s decisions regarding their daughter. Kaspar also has to acknowledge the complexities of German reunification which has not solved all the problems. Even Kaspar’s understanding of Birgit increases.

I enjoyed the book and recommend it. Readers who do not like ambiguous endings may not be satisfied by the novel’s partial resolution, but given the book’s subject matter, the ending is appropriate. Though the focus is political radicalization in Germany, I found the book timely: it made me consider the political radicalization so obvious in the U.S., especially following the most recent presidential election.

Review of THE RESISTANCE PAINTER by Kath Jonathan (New Release)

 3 Stars

This is a dual timeline novel.

Irena Marianowska is an art student living in Warsaw with her mother and sister when the Nazis invade Poland. She immediately joins the Home Army and remains involved in the resistance movement throughout the war, becoming an expert in navigating the sewer system of the city to transport people and goods.

In Toronto, 2010, Jo Blum looks after her grandmother Irena, a decorated war hero and renowned painter. An artist herself, Jo creates sculptures for grave sites based on the lives of her clients. She is hired to do one for Stefan Cegielski. When Jo comes to interview him, she discovers parallels between his wartime past and that of her grandmother. Intrigued, she starts investigating further and uncovers some surprising family secrets.

One issue with the novel is the number of names one character can have. It’s easy to remember that Jo is Josephine and Mati is Mateusz, but things become more confusing: Irena Marianowska, Irena Iwanowska, Renka, Ala, and Wit are the same person; Alexandra, Ola, Olenka, and Zofia are the same person; and Szarlota, Lotka, and Charlotte are the same person. I’m not sure there’s a need for so much obfuscation.

I enjoyed learning about the Armia Krajowa, the Home Army, which was the dominant resistance movement in German-occupied Poland during World War II. Though my ancestors come from Poland, I knew little about his period in the country’s history. I had never heard about how the sewer system allowed the Polish Home Army to move supplies and people between isolated districts. The descriptions of the smells and rats emphasize the horrors of navigating these underground routes.

I found it difficult to believe that Jo knows so little about her grandmother. Jo, her mother, and her grandparents lived together yet Jo asks, “How is it that I know so little about my grandmother’s life?” Then as she becomes more curious, she avoids asking, more than once using the weak excuse “Now is not the time to ask.”

There are other issues with Jo’s behaviour. Despite her Polish heritage, she can’t differentiate German and Polish when spoken? She has a confidentiality agreement with her client Stefan but she breaks it so unthinkingly, telling what she’s learned not only to Irena but also to Irena’s art dealer? She looks after Irena as her health fails, yet only at the very end does she notice “for the first time a small, deep scar on her left leg above her ankle”? She struggles to make doctor’s appointments for her grandmother, but then she doesn’t insist on Irena going?

There are a lot of coincidences that had me shaking my head in disbelief. How many times does Ala encounter Davey just by chance? Irena doesn’t figure out the clue about meeting at the bakery, but she manages to arrive just at the right time?

To add local colour, the author added some Polish words, but I found the repetition of cholera (23 times) tedious after a while. Some terms like łapanka and Hitlerow are not explained.

The book is unnecessarily long. It drags at time; for instance, Jo’s avoidance of questioning her grandmother feels like plot manipulation. There’s interesting information, but there’s also some unnecessary repetition.

Note: I received an eARC from the publisher via NetGalley.

Review of THE CASE OF THE LONELY ACCOUNTANT by Simon Mason

 3 Stars

This is the second of the Finder Mysteries which focuses on Talib, a specialist in finding people. Having enjoyed the first book in the series, Missing Person: Alice, I decided to listen to the second one.

In 2008, Don Bayliss, a well-respected accountant, vanished in Bournemouth. His clothes discarded by the harbour led police to presume death by suicide. Fifteen years later, the discovery of a possible connection to a convicted criminal results in the case being re-opened. The Finder is hired to determine exactly what happened to the quiet accountant.

Talib re-interviews everyone associated with Don at the time of his disappearance: his wife, colleagues, neighbours, acquaintances, etc. His slow and methodical approach results in uncovering clues that were missed in the initial investigation. As expected in the investigation of a cold case, this is not an action-packed book.

As in the first novel, literature is used to suggest parallels to the case. Talib is reading Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde and with its theme of dualities, it is soon obvious that part of solving the mystery of Don’s disappearance is determining who the real Don Bayliss was. Was he the hardworking and scrupulously honest colleague or an embezzler? Was he a dull and dutiful husband or a sexual predator?

I liked learning more about Talib’s past which explains his choice of career. He remains the intelligent, thorough, and compassionate man we met in the first book but discovering more events in his past helps the reader to understand him better.

I didn’t enjoy this second book as much because it seems formulaic in that it has so many similarities with the first. In my review of that book, I referred to a character mentioning that people often present contradictory versions of themselves to different people. That is very much a theme in this novel as well, as is the examination of the impact of the missing person on those left behind.

A third book is scheduled for release later this year, but I’m not certain I’ll add it to my audiobook collection. Will it just follow the same formula and repeat the same themes?

Review of MAD HONEY by Jodi Picoult and Jennifer Finney Boylan

 3 Stars

This novel has many of the hallmarks of a Jodi Picoult novel: more than one narrator, a focus on family, an exploration of contemporary social issues, and surprise twists and revelations. Unfortunately, as I’ve found with her other books, her desire to educate readers overshadows the need to entertain via a plausible plot.

Eighteen-year-old Asher Fields is charged with the murder of his girlfriend Lily Campanello. The trial reveals that both kept secrets and told lies so even Olivia, Asher’s mother, starts to doubt her son’s innocence.

There are two narrators who appear in alternating chapters. One narrator is Olivia; she narrates in the present tense, moving forward from the day of Lily’s death. The other narrator is Lily; she also narrates in the present tense but her chapters move backwards from the day of her death. Lily’s sections, a type of internal monologue, bothered me. She has a closely guarded secret, but she never reveals what it is – even to herself? Is it necessary to have the first 200 pages, half of the book, hide the main topic? Also, the reverse time of Lily’s chapters means that she vaguely refers to something that happened earlier and then in her next chapter will actually describe what happened; this narrative approach means that there is a lot of repetition. By the time we reach the end of the novel, we already know her story because of what Olivia relates about the trial, so Lily has little new information to add.

There are issues with the courtroom scenes. Olivia details the testimony of others and then testifies herself. Perhaps I’m wrong, but my understanding is that witnesses are usually not allowed to hear other witnesses' testimony. Then the great reveal happens during the trial and comes as a total shock to everyone except Ava, Lily’s mother? If Ava believes the motive for her daughter’s murder is connected to Lily’s secret, wouldn’t she have told the prosecutor? Her statement that “’Is there a reason I had to?’” is unconvincing. Then the reason Lily dies has nothing to do with this secret, the novel’s raison d'être?

Once the main subject is finally introduced, the novel becomes didactic. I certainly understand the need to inform people and I agree with the author’s opinion, but there are information dumps that impede narrative flow. Though she has never mentioned it specifically for half the novel, Lily suddenly writes about nothing but the nature of her secret and goes on and on. At times the tone becomes didactic and so many topics are touched on: bullying, physical and psychological abuse, transphobia, homophobia, racism, and domestic violence. There’s an abortion, suicide attempts, and even police brutality. Is it necessary to have both a same sex couple and an interracial couple? It’s as if the authors feel they must mention every serious issue found in contemporary society.

Then there’s the information about bees and honey. I can see parallels between the experiences of the bees and those of the characters: a hive is virtually destroyed and a home no longer feels safe either. Olivia’s attempts to save a hive indicate her personality and parallel her attempts to save her son. And the reference to mad honey can’t be missed; certainly, more than one relationship in the book seems sweet but proves to be damaging. But I did find some of the information about honeybees to be superfluous and, again, it impedes narrative flow.

The ending of the trial is not a surprise and subsequent revelations confirm what I suspected. Much of the plot is a teenage love story so the development at the end can hardly be shocking. Unfortunately, there are unanswered questions at the end: at least two people never have to answer for their actions? Domestic violence and obstruction of justice go unpunished?

The book is entertaining, but there are weaknesses I found difficult to ignore.