3 Stars
This is the third book in the series featuring a Muslim Canadian police officer, Esa Khattak, and his partner, Rachel Getty.
Esa is vacationing
in Iran when he is approached by a Canadian agent and a group of dissidents who
ask him to look into the government-sanctioned torture and killing of an
Iranian-Canadian filmmaker, Zahra Sobhani.
Among the questions he must ask is why she would have risked returning
to Iran after making a film critical of Iran’s human rights record. Esa quietly investigates in Iran while trying
to avoid the attention of government handlers; Rachel and Nathan Clare, Esa’s
best friend, follow up leads in Canada.
The plot is
very convoluted and can sometimes be difficult to follow. There are so many twists and turns in the
investigation and so many unknowns that I was sometimes confused. For example, cryptic messages/codes feature
prominently. Esa receives cryptic
messages from an unknown writer; letters between a former minister of Iran and
his activist friend could have played a role in Zahra’s capture; letters of the
alphabet written on a sleeve become a crucial clue; encoded messages and
drawings are written on the wall of a house; and diary entries or letters from
a prisoner are interspersed throughout. So
much deciphering just gets annoying, and some of it just seems illogical. The letters of the alphabet written on a
sleeve are certainly a stretch!
What is
also annoying is the many romantic tensions between characters. Esa seems attracted to Rachel but he is also
fascinated by Nasreen and finds himself thinking often about Sehr? Rachel seems attracted to Esa but she is also interested
in Nate? Vicky and Touka are both attracted
to Esa. Nathan likes Rachel but then
there’s an episode with Laine?
One of the
things that the book does well is to reveal the contradictions in Iranian
society. The beauty of the mosques is
contrasted with the ugly brutality of a repressive regime. Some knowledge of Iranian history is
certainly needed to understand the plot.
I knew of some of the events since I’m old enough to have lived during
some of them: the rule of Shah Reza
Pahlavi, the 1979 revolution, the election of Ahmadinejad, the nuclear
agreement with which President Trump disagrees. It also became obvious to me that the murder
of Zahra Sobhani was inspired by the real-life murder of Canadian-Iranian
photojournalist Zahra Kazemi. Fortunately,
for those not familiar with Iranian history, there is a timeline of major
political events provided at the beginning.
The author’s
sympathy for Iran certainly comes across.
At one point, she has Rachel make a telling observation: “What must it be like to know your
civilization possessed of such celestial beauty, and to find yourself the
object of diminishment?” Rachel had imagined
Iran “as a place of violence and turmoil” but a visit to a mosque amazes her
with its “sublimity” and “perfect cohesion of light” and “tranquility” and “dignity.” “This amphitheater of joy” allows her to
experience a “soaring elevation of spirit” and her impression of the country is
changed: “Her lens was correcting
itself.” Obviously, the author thinks
that many people need to have their opinions of Iran re-adjusted.
There is
also the suggestion that many people have misconceptions about Muslims. Esa behaves as he does because of the
assumptions made about Muslims: “Careful
and measured consideration was the only way he knew to answer the assumption of
Muslim rage.” He feels he is not able to
ever be totally at ease to express “the different sides of himself, the things
that enriched him.”
Unfortunately,
the book sometimes becomes bogged down.
There are long passages of exposition:
“There were an estimated one million Sunnis in Tehran alone who were not
permitted to build schools or places of worship, or to disseminate their own
religious teachings. And though this
treatment of non-Shia minorities was unjust, the fate of ethnic and religious
minorities in many Sunni-majority countries was exponentially worse. [Esa] had only to think of the violence
against Shia processionals in Pakistan, or the increasingly disturbing attacks
against Pakistan’s Christian and Hindu minorities. The country’s Hazara population, who were largely
Shia, suffered extensive persecution by the Taliban, that was typically met
with indifference by the state.” A
discussion of religious repression in Pakistan is used to suggest that Iran’s
mistreatment of its religious minorities is not that bad? None of this has any bearing on the plot.
I would
advise readers to read the first two books in the series (The Unquiet Dead and The
Language of Secrets) if they have not done so. The relationships between the characters are
developed in these earlier books, and in Among
the Ruins, there is repeated reference to the events of the second novel. I did not find this novel as interesting as
the previous two, but it provides wonderful insight into a culture foreign to
many Canadians.
No comments:
Post a Comment