Three women (Samantha, Lisa, and Nicole) in their forties re-enact a 5-day hike on an isolated coastal trail. When they began this hike 24 years earlier, they had a confrontation with an aggressive man in the parking lot at the trailhead. Thereafter he watched them and deliberately instilled fear by making silent but threatening gestures. It is obvious that something happened before the end of the trip; whatever transpired changed the three and destroyed their friendship because they have not spoken to each other in over 20 years.
Lisa convinces the
other two women to take the hike again.
She suggests they can reshape the memories of the original experience,
thereby healing the wounds that were inflicted.
Perhaps too their fractured friendship can be mended; she hopes “to have
the qualities of their friendship returned to her and all the goodness that might
come with it if it can be.” There is
certainly no doubt that the experience had a major impact on their lives. Lisa thinks of how the landscape and what
happened “Damaged them. How much of what
happened here has been carried with them into the everyday, washed up in their
lives like those fragments of stone.”
Samantha thinks of how “their friendship had unraveled and Samantha
doesn’t think she’s felt good about herself since.” Nicole thinks about how “She didn’t believe
or trust in herself to succeed [because everything] . . . that was strong and
good about her was taken away . . . [and] She lost her faith in humanity that
day.”
It is not until the
end that the reader learns exactly what happened on that fateful hike, so there
is a great deal of suspense in the book.
As the women walk the trail in the present, there are flashbacks to what
occurred along the same sections of trail.
There was a pervasive air of menace and even the rugged landscape seemed
threatening. Though the timeframe has
changed, the locale is the same so the women are anxious, and because of their 20-year
estrangement, there’s tension among them.
All of these emotions are passed on to the reader.
Each of the women emerges
as a distinct individual with clearly identifiable traits. For instance, one is motivated by anger, another
is the peacekeeper, and the third distrusts people. This differentiation is achieved by the novel’s
structure. Each woman is the focus of an
equal number of chapters. We hear her
inner dialogue as she remembers the past, thinks about the choices she made
then, and considers how subsequent decisions in her life were influenced by the
past: “Who or what might she have been
if these things hadn’t happened to her?”
Each of the women is
dynamic. Mostly each learns about
herself. Lisa, for instance,
acknowledges that when they drifted apart, “they weren’t running from each
other. They were running from
themselves.” At the beginning, it is
easy for them to blame each other for what happened: “Trying to make her say Yep, all my fault, so she can have a clear conscience.” Eventually, however, each must acknowledge
her role in what happened during the hike and the dissolution of their
friendship: “Memory might try and serve
it differently, that one person instigated . . . more than another, but in
truth they were all complicit . . . ”.
The book examines the
dynamics of friendships. Samantha
describes their friendship: “They were
tight. Inseparable. Individual slights led to collective
umbrage. Heart scars were shared.” Nicole agrees: “They only had to be themselves. That’s what made their friendship strong.” On the first hike, the friendship was tested;
as they faced increasing fear, their stress caused them to turn on each
other. And after the first hike, “It
only took two weeks to undo eight years [of friendship].” Each mourns the loss of the friendships. One of them acknowledges “She still feels the
loss of what they had. She registers it
as an irretrievable absence inside her” and another thinks her friends would
have helped her, that maybe “they’d have looked out for her and steered her
away from a man they would have recognized as good at manipulation.” Can the women repair their relationships if
they realize that a friendship has “to be nurtured and cared for, like a garden”
and that if one lightens the burden of another, “She doesn’t notice the extra
weight after a while. It soon becomes a
part of her own”?
As soon as I started
reading this book, I was totally absorbed.
It is so emotionally immersive and thought-provoking that I will not
soon forget it. I keep asking myself how
I would have reacted in similar circumstances.
Hello Doreen. Thank you so much for your wonderfully detailed review of The Geography of Friendship - I really appreciate the time you've taken to put your thoughts down. And I love the way you explore those thoughts by linking them back to supporting lines of dialogue from the story. I think it helps give readers of your blog a strong sense of who the three women at the heart of the story are, what they lost on the first hike and what they hope to gain on the second. All best, Sally
ReplyDelete