3.5 Stars
This book
has appeared on a number of summer reading lists, so I thought I’d add it to
mine. It proved to be an enjoyable
psychological novel.
The book
introduces us to David Bateman and his family.
He is a media mogul married to Maggie, a former teacher, and they have
two children: Rachel and JJ. They board a private jet for a short trip
from Martha’s Vineyard to New York City.
Travelling with them is Ben Kipling, a Wall Street player, and his wife
Sarah. Maggie also invited a friend and
artist, Scott Burroughs, to take the plane since he too needed to get to New
York. A Bateman bodyguard, a flight
attendant, and the pilot and co-pilot are the others onboard. “[None] of them has any idea that sixteen
minutes from [takeoff] their plane will crash into the sea.” Only Scott and four-year-old JJ survive.
The book
then follows the investigation into the crash and also gives the back stories
of each of the people on the plane. There
are various theories as to the cause - mechanical error, pilot error, sabotage,
and terrorist attack – and all must be investigated. However, a talk show commentator, Bill
Cunningham, suggests a fifth theory centered on Scott. Focusing only on ratings, he uses illegal
methods to advance his theory.
A major
theme detailed is that of random coincidences.
In the opening, the author suggests, “How any two people end up in the same
place at the same time is a mystery.”
Later, Scott muses, “Two things happen at the same time. By mentioning them together they become
connected. Convergence. It’s one of those things that feels meaningful, but isn’t.” A major investigator scolds a colleague: “’you just can’t accept that life is full of
random coincidence, that not everything that seems meaningful is meaningful
. . . ‘” And Scott tells Bill, “’The universe is filled with things that don’t
make sense. Random coincidences.’”
The novel
is definitely character driven. The
reader comes to know each of the passengers and crew as well as JJ’s aunt and
uncle and Bill Cunningham. Bill, who
wears suspenders like Larry King, is a conservative commentator, similar to
Bill O’Reilly of Fox News. He is not
beyond relying on half-truths to cast aspersions and ruin someone’s reputation
though he makes comments like “’I’ll fight to the death before I let this administration
take away our right to due process.’” The
character with whom I take exception is Doug, JJ’s uncle; everyone else is
realistic, but he just doesn’t feel like a writer to me. For instance, he doesn’t know the meaning of “pied-à-terre”
but knows what a koan is?
Though
there is suspense, I would not call this book a thriller. The ending is not a surprise; in fact, the
denouement is exactly like an actual 2015 event from the news, an event to
which the chief investigator actually refers and which had regulatory agencies
implementing new flight regulations.
From the beginning, the clues are just too obvious.
Despite its
flaws, this book is indeed a good summer read.
It has sufficient suspense to keep the reader on task. And I loved its skewering of archconservative
media outlets and commentators.
No comments:
Post a Comment