4 Stars
This novel caught my attention when it appeared on the shortlist for
the 2025 Booker Prize.
In 1978,
ten-year-old Louisa Kang goes for a walk on a Japanese beach with her
father Serk. The next morning she is found unconscious on the shore,
but Serk has vanished. From this pivotal event, the novel moves back
and then forwards in time. There are flashbacks to Serk’s
childhood. Known as Hiroshi, he was born in Japan to Korean parents
born on the island of Jeju. After the war, they leave for North
Korea, lured by promises of a socialist paradise. Serk, however,
moves to the U.S. where he becomes a professor and marries Anne, an
American white woman. Louisa is their only child, though Anne, when
she was nineteen, had a son Tobias whom she relinquished to his
father. Serk agrees to an exchange year in Japan from which he never
returns. What happened to him? Though he is presumed to have
drowned, a body is never found, and the reader comes to suspect that
Serk’s disappearance may in fact be connected to geopolitical
events.
At over 450 pages,
the book is fairly lengthy. It is also dense and so sometimes feels
like an intellectual exercise. Choi loves complex sentences and em
dashes. For instance, Serk, upon seeing Anne take their daughter to
swimming lessons reacts with rage: “Only the inhibition that
overcame Serk in those settings in which he was unusually anomalous,
as he was at the YMCA pool – not just the only foreigner but the
only person in a suit, his shirt sticking to his sides in the
chemically pungent humidity, his dress shoes slipping on the pool
deck as though he were trespassing in some stranger’s giant
bathroom, the incessant thundering echo of screaming and splashing
almost, but not quite, emboldening him to give vent to his rage on
the spot – had prevented him from giving vent to his rage on the
spot.” Sometimes sentences need to be re-read because their
purpose gets lost in the numerous phrases and clauses.
The novel used third
person omniscient narration but each chapter focuses on a different
character, mostly Serk, Anne, or Louisa. This approach means that we
learn of Serk’s fate even though it remains unknown to his family.
Of course, readers also come to know each of these characters very
well: their thoughts, feelings, hopes, and dreams. All three,
however, are difficult to like. All are stubborn and self-centred;
they all seem to lack empathy. Serk, for instance, is impatient and
arrogant and constantly aggrieved; he has no empathy for Anne or
Louisa when he decides unilaterally to move them all to Japan. When
Anne reunites with Tobias, she has little concern for how that might
affect Louisa. When her mother’s health becomes a concern, Louisa
shows no sympathy whatsoever.
What stands out is
that there often seems little connection among the three; they
interact but remain loners, alienated from each other. In many ways,
the book is about secrets and their consequences. Serk never tells
Anne about his childhood in Japan and his family’s emigration to
North Korea. He doesn’t share that his return to Japan has a
hidden agenda: seeing his sister and perhaps bringing his family
back to Japan. Anne reunites with her son without telling her
husband. Just before they leave for Japan, she begins to experience
symptoms of an illness but keeps them to herself until it’s
impossible to hide them. Pre-occupied with their private concerns,
neither parent shares with Louisa so she feels isolated from them
just as she also feels alienated in a new culture. At one point,
Louisa thinks, “The sum of the things she knows about her father
could fit inside the sum of the things she’ll never know about him
an infinite number of times. The things she knows about him are as
meager as a pair of backgammon dice rattling in their cup.” This
statement applies to all of them. If, instead of silence, there had
been real communication, the dynamics would have been very different.
The metaphor of the flashlight works well in emphasizing how each
character tends to see only what is in front of him/her. So much
remains in darkness so they all stumble along.
Of course the
remoteness that develops is understandable. They build walls to
protect themselves and so end up joyless. Serk, though born in
Japan, is a second-class citizen there and is also never accepted as
an American. When just a young man, he loses his entire family.
Anne, at nineteen, is placed in a position where she must give up her
child. As an adult, she is ostracized because she married a
foreigner. Then she becomes a widow. Louisa, because of her
parentage and appearance, feels out of place. Then she loses her
father, with whom she was very close, just as Anne’s diagnosis
means she must prioritize her own health. So despite the three
characters being rather unlikeable, readers cannot but have sympathy
for them.
There is much to
parse in this book. The effect of world politics on individuals
deserves discussion, but that would be a spoiler. I recommend the
book but advise that readers set aside considerable time to read it;
it deserves to be read slowly and to be given careful thought.