Ranked a Top 25 Canadian Book Blog
Twitter: @DCYakabuski
Facebook: Doreen Yakabuski
Instagram: doreenyakabuski
Threads: doreenyakabuski
Substack: @doreenyakabuski
Bluesky: @dcyakabuski.bsky.social

Friday, December 20, 2019

Review of A NEARLY NORMAL FAMILY by M. T. Edvardsson

3 Stars
Eighteen-year-old Stella Sandell is accused of killing Chris Olsen, a man 14 years her senior.  Her father Adam, a pastor, and her mother Ulrika, a criminal defense attorney, are devastated.  They wonder if Stella could be capable of murder and have to determine what they can/will do to protect her.


The novel has a 3-part structure.  Adam narrates the longest, first section; he focuses on the past, describing their family life and Stella’s childhood and personality.  Then, we are given Stella’s perspective from prison.  Finally, Ulrika narrates the last portion which focuses on the actual trial.  Of course, there is overlap as each part provides a new perspective on events.

None of the three is convincing or likeable.  For a church pastor, Adam is very naïve.  He claims to be able to detect when someone is lying yet that proves not to be true.  He is overly protective of Stella, insisting on counselling when Stella tries drugs, yet when she suffers a real trauma, he does not ensure that she has the help she needs.  He seems to have anger management issues and is constantly forcefully grabbing people by the arm.  Ulrika is a workaholic who has difficulty communicating with her daughter but serves as a confidant for Stella’s best friend Amina.  She is supposedly a very good criminal defense attorney but she forgets about cell phone records?  Stella has impulse control issues and is a thrill seeker who is easily bored. 

There is not a great deal of suspense.  Because there is considerable repetition in the three parts, suspense is diminished.  There is the mystery of who killed Chris Olsen but there are rather obvious clues:  “The only thing that would be worse [than being in prison] is if Amina had to be locked up.”

The novel wants the reader to ask a couple of questions:  How well do you know your own children? How far would you go to protect them?  The author suggests that parents often know little about their offspring and when it comes to one’s family, “People are prepared to put aside everything in the way of ethics and morals to protect their families.  The most rigid of principles can be easily pulverized when it comes to defending your own child.  Lies, guilt, and secrets.  What family isn’t built on such grounds?” 

This is what I consider a mediocre book.  The blurb suggests it will be interesting, but the book itself proves to be much less so. 

No comments:

Post a Comment